Principal-led engagements with defined scope and deliverables. We align on objectives and constraints, then deliver decision-grade and execution-grade artifacts—pulling in specialist capabilities as required.
Remote-first (CET). Workshops onsite by agreement for key alignment moments.

Enterprise AI programs fail less on model quality and more on system-level decisions: unclear boundaries, missing guardrails, fragmented ownership, and no testable acceptance criteria. Without the right entry point, teams either overbuild early or accumulate risk that later becomes expensive to unwind.
Choose the engagement that matches your reality: decide where AI is worth it (Discovery), define the blueprint teams can execute against (Blueprint), or embed controls and assurance so production stays trustworthy (Control Plane & Assurance).

“We don’t know if AI makes sense.”
Make the right AI bets with confidence.
Decision-grade go/no-go, explicit boundaries, and a plan your teams can execute—before you commit build capacity.

“We have a business case and want to start.”
Turn pilots into repeatable delivery.
Execution-grade target architecture, reference designs, and guardrails—plus ownership and an operating model teams can follow.

“AI is in production, but complexity is rising.”
Operate production with confidence at scale.
Measurable quality/safety gates, audit-ready evidence, and cost/latency guardrails embedded into delivery.
A simple heuristic to identify the right starting point.
When
You're early or uncertain
Choose
AI Value Discovery
Typical Signal
You need clarity, boundaries, and a credible plan before committing build capacity.
When
You're moving beyond pilots
Choose
Architecture Blueprint
Typical Signal
You need decisions, reference designs, and an operating model teams/vendors can execute.
When
You're scaling in production
Choose
Control Plane & Assurance
Typical Signal
You need repeatability: controls, evaluation, cost/latency guardrails, and audit-ready evidence.